During Tuesday’s three-hour hearing, the judge did not seem to take issue with the contents of the KERP itself (which has also been approved by the unsecured creditors’ committee), but was bewildered and irritated by a second motion filed by Celsius’ lawyers on Oct. 11 seeking to file most of the details of the KERP under seal, including the plan participants’ “job titles, job descriptions, supervisors, hiring personnel, corresponding salaries and proposed KERP award.”
